EED (short for Earth Energy Designer) has historically been the biggest player in Europe when it comes to borefield design software. But with GHEtool Cloud, there is new player in town! In this article, we will go over both tools in more detail and explain to you their strengths and weaknesses.
EED (Earth Energy Designer)
In 1994, Hellström and Sanner published a conference paper titled ‘Software for Dimensioning of Deep Boreholes for Heat Extraction,’ emphasizing the necessity of borefield design software over traditional rules of thumb (available on their website here). This paper stretched the importance of using computer-assisted simulations for borefield sizing. Their software, Earth Energy Designer, marked a milestone in this domain, enabling engineers and drilling firms to utilize computational tools for more precise and efficient borefield designs.
Currently, Earth Energy Designer is maintained by and available through Blocon (Sweden).
GHEtool Cloud
GHEtool (acronym of Ground Heat Exchanger tool) was founded during the master thesis of Wouter Peere at the KU Leuven (The SySi Team). A year later, in 2021, with the support of Boydens Engineering (part of Sweco) and the FH Aachen the open-source code was shown to the public at the International Building Simulation Conference of IBPSA in Bruges (the paper can be found here). At that time, GHEtool was the first open-source based borefield sizing tool, receiving a recognition from the Journal Of Open-Source Software in 2022. GHEtool Pro, developed for professional users, was published in 2023. Since November 2024 GHEtool Cloud is the new, official version of GHEtool and is maintained by and available through Enead – energieadvies (Belgium).
Comparison between GHEtool Cloud and Earth Energy Designer
Although both tools offer the capability to design borefields, there are significant differences to consider when choosing between them.
- In practice, borefield design typically involves iterative processes, including making changes and comparing different design options. GHEtool Cloud is based on such scenario analyses, allowing users to easily duplicate calculations, make adjustments, and observe the effects without altering the original scenario. In contrast, EED either overwrites previous calculations or necessitates working with multiple files, making the comparing process more cumbersome.
- As projects grow increasingly complex, borefield designs deviate further from simple rectangular configurations. GHEtool Cloud offers unparalleled flexibility in borehole positioning, allowing users to input borefields with highly customized configurations directly via coordinates. In contrast, while Earth Energy Designer accommodates irregular borefield configurations, these are ultimately reduced to predefined regular options.
- Beyond borefield sizing, GHEtool Cloud provides additional functionalities and assists in sizing hybrid systems. With its innovative ‘optimize load profile’ feature, users can estimate the percentage of a building load that can be met geothermally, thereby enhancing the economic feasibility of geothermal borehole projects. EED, on the other hand, is limited to borefield sizing functionalities.
- Both GHEtool Cloud and EED can work with monthly and hourly load profiles for calculations. W.r.t. monthly load data, both tools can work with both absolute and relative load inputs. The difference here is that with GHEtool Cloud, you have the option to import monthly loads from a *.csv file, where EED does not have this option. When using hourly data, GHEtool Cloud allows a direct import of a CSV file, whereas EED necessitates conversion to a specific *.txt file format before import.
- A crucial design criterion is the fluid regime within the borehole, whether laminar or turbulent. However, in practise, the fluid is neither laminar nor turbulent, but something in between. This fluid regime is called ’transition’, which is not modeled within EED and can result in underestimations of borehole thermal resistance. GHEtool Cloud takes this third regime into account and hence calculates the fluid regime more accurately, solving the issue of underestimating the thermal resistance. (See also this article in our knowledge base for more information.)
- Clients often demand sizing reports or calculation data for a particular project. GHEtool Cloud streamlines this process by automatically exporting calculations into a ready-to-go PDF report (example report), saving both time and effort. In contrast, EED provides an exhaustive list of calculated parameters which can be used for manual reporting.
- Trial periods and demos play an important role in software selection. GHEtool Cloud offers a full, unrestricted 14-day trial, while the EED demo version is limited, restricting functionalities such as loading/saving calculations, altering ground properties, and working with hourly data.
- Since GHEtool Cloud is 100% online, it can work all operating systems: Windows, Mac Os and Linux. You can even look up your geothermal calculations on your smartphone!